Document Archive
All Posts · 232
(Seoul Economic Daily Editorial, March 12, 2025) Is Clinging to a Plan to Pay 4 Percentage Points More and Receive 4 Percentage Points More Pension Reform? (Posted October 9, 2026)2026.10.09
(JoongAng Ilbo Report, April 25, 2024) Serious Error in Pension Reform Material — The Effect of Raising the Income Replacement Rate Was Exaggerated (October 9, 2026)2026.10.09
(Chosun Ilbo Report, September 2, 2023) Only '15% + Age 68 + 1 Percentage Point Higher' Keeps the Fund Going Through 2093. "A Pension Reform Plan to Pay More and Receive Later" (Posted October 9, 2026)2026.10.09
(Channel A News Top 10, Assessment of the Government Employees Pension Act Amendment, Report of May 4, 2015) “It Cannot Go On Like This” — Government Employees Pension Reform Veers Off Course (Posted October 8, 2026)2026.10.08
(Committee Member Yun Suk-myung, Weekly Donga Interview, May 14, 2024) [Video] "Left as It Is, the National Pension Will Lead the Nation to Ruin" (Posted May 14, 2024)2026.10.08
(Questioning by Representative Park Su-min, Special Committee on Pension Reform of the 22nd National Assembly, September 29, 2026) National Pension Rebuked over “Rebalancing Deferral” — Why Didn’t You Do It? (Posted October 6, 2026)2026.10.06
[Contributed Article] Young People’s Misunderstandings About the National Pension (May 22, 2026)2026.05.23
[Column] National Pension Social Investment Should Take Japan as a Cautionary Tale (2026-05-19)2026.05.19
OECD: "Korea Should Integrate Operation of the National Pension and the Government Employees Pension" (September 20, 2022)2026.04.28
[Special Feature | Government Employees Pension Reform] Already 515 Trillion Won in Debt, “Major Reform” Unavoidable — Revised (September 5, 2014)2026.04.27
