All Posts · 182
(Korea Economic Daily, 2013) [Current Issues Pro-and-Con Debate] Should the National Pension's Payment Be Guaranteed by Law?2025.12.12
A 45% Income Replacement Rate Would Add 1,500 Trillion Won to the Fiscal Burden2025.12.12
(The Illusion of the 2015 Government Employees Pension Reform) A Backdoor Maneuver in the Government Employees Pension … Selecting the General-Population Life Table Rather Than the Civil-Servant Table2025.12.12
[May 2015 JTBC Interview] Professor Kim Yeon-myung: "The Claim That Contributions Would Double Is Exaggerated"2025.12.12
[Fact Check] Raising the National Pension's Income Replacement Rate to 50% Without Raising Contributions? Essentially Impossible2025.12.12
(2015) Pension Reform: Removing a 333-Trillion-Won Lump Only to Add a 1,669-Trillion-Won One2025.12.12
(2022 Interview) "Obligations Stand at 2,500 Trillion Won While Reserves Total Only 920 Trillion — National Pension Reform Is Urgent"2025.12.12
(2007) "Is the Government Attempting to Reverse the Roh Moo-hyun Reforms?"2025.12.12
The Debate over the Need to Raise the National Pension Income Replacement Rate That Emerged During the 2015 Government Employees Pension Reform Process2025.12.12
The Debate over National Pension Contribution Rate Increases at the Third Financial Estimation Committee in 20132025.12.12